zero doping – cero dopaje

July 18, 2010

Should I be Worried about Lance?

Filed under: Athletes — Tags: , , , — admin @ 1:06 am

The tour de france seemed to be going so well. No revelations this time. And I am hoping that the likes of Vinikourov have learned their lessons and will not be so stupid as to risk capture again.

But a dark cloud is gathering.

It seems the federal authorities in the USA are taking Floyd Landis’s allegations seriously.

The same man who headed up the investigation into BALCO laboratories will now be examining evidence arising from the Landis revelations.

Clearly Landis is not the best of witnesses. You cannot strenuously deny allegations of doping for so many years THEN be taken seriously when you say “OK, I did it, and all these others are cheating too…”

They say that some other US postal riders are willing to cooperate (although this maybe heresay) – the federal authorities have also said they are only interested in team leaders.

Surely THAT is a defence that has not worked since nuremberg…”but my leader told me to do xyz” has never been a defense in law.

That aside, what worries me most is the carefully crafted statement from the Armstrong camp.

- That Landis’s revelations are a “carton of sour milk” – one sip and you know it is bad.

- That you cannot trust a word that Landis has said!

What seems to be missing to me is a very strenuous denial of all allegations. And a clear statement that he and the team were clean, before and after the remarks above.  Of course that could be just the fact that after so many accusations, you simply run out of steam in denials.

I hope so, I hope for the sport Armstrong is and was Clean.

I am glad that Hincapie has come out with a far more emphatic denial. 

It will be devastating for the sport  if the allegations are proven at any level.

Pat McQuaid Has come out in support of armstrong. I hope he is right.

One of the iconic moments of the tour I will remember for a long time…was Lance and Jan Ullrich on the lower slopes of Alpe Huez. Lance accelerates. Turns – stares at Ullrich, then dances away up the hill to win.

I hope that was pure talent.

June 24, 2010

Splintered Testing Policy – An Ill Wind Blowing No Good

Filed under: Drug Test Policy — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 8:25 pm

When agencies compete for the right to test athletes it cannot be anything other than divisive for the sport as a whole.

WADA turned down a request from the French Anti-doping Agency who wanted to carry out their own tests at the Tour de France.

Claiming “that it has access to confidential information from police and customs that it cannot share with other organisations”

And with that hangs a serious problem.

Our sport can only suffer from the lack of a unified face.

Whilst I don’t want to come down in any direction on the Ramussen case a couple of years ago at the TDF – I can have sympathy with Ramussen’s contention over jurisdiction.

For as long as he was complying with testing from UCI, should he really have DOUBLE the calls on his availability simply because of being a Dane, where Contador had only UCI restrictions because of where he lived?

At the time it SOUNDED like very much like a grudge to settle by the Danish federation, for the unwillingness of Rasmussen to compete on a Danish stage, and whether or not that was actually so is almost irrelevant.

Open a crack, and the media will crowbar it out to a chasm.

It cannot help the image of sport when federations seem to be bickering over jurisdiction.

So please agencies – have these discussions behind closed doors, then pronounce a decision with a unified face

Surely if there is sufficient cause to suspect a crime is being committed under french law with proper evidence for the same then there are procedures that can be used to pursue that.

I have to assume the evidence is far more circumstantial than that and that the TDF is as much arguing from a “rights” point of view than prima facie evidence of crime.

I can understand of course how the TDF is concerned about the damage done to its name. Sat where I am the Rasmussen affair was not handled with nearly enough discretion by the TDF.

Powered by WordPress